A public information meeting on the conversion of the former Quality Inn hotel at 6465 201 St. into supportive housing for the homeless ended abruptly on Monday night, as audience members began leaving in the middle of speeches, half an hour after the meeting was scheduled to be over.
During the event, held at the 91原创 Events Centre, about 40 questions and statements were given from members of the public to a panelist from BC Housing, Fraser Health, Stepping Stone Community Services Society and 91原创 Community Services Society, with many residents speaking two or three times.
This information meeting followed a number of 30-person consultation sessions held earlier this month.
READ MORE:
As the variety of comments indicated, the community is still very divided on the project, which will see the 50-room hotel converted to 49 units of supporting housing with 24/7 on-site care.
Stepping Stone will operate the housing and have at least two staff members on duty at all times. The housing will also include an office for the new Integrated Care Management (ICM) team funded through Fraser Health. The team includes a nurse practitioner, psychologist and psych nurse.
Those who spoke against the proposal cited concerns with the building鈥檚 location, fear that it will lead to increases in crime and drug deals in the area, and general safety for those who live, work and shop near the facility.
One woman, who did not provide her name, said she does not support the location, specifically, as it is 鈥渋n the heart鈥� of a densely populated community, surrounded by schools, family homes and daycares that are within walking distance.
鈥淏ased on the information provided by the September 2017 homeless count in Metro Vancouver final report, 53 per cent of the homeless population are addicted to substances 鈥� and 38 per cent suffer from mental illness. So my question today is, how are you going to manage the risks it will bring to the surrounding community?鈥� she asked.
Another woman, who also did not provide her name, asked if BC Housing could 鈥渢weak the plan鈥� to help both the homeless, and the residents in the area.
鈥淐an it be, perhaps, a drug free location for the people who are in programs to become drug free?鈥� she asked. 鈥淛ust to find a compromise between some of the concerns we have in the surrounding community and helping the people who need the help the most.鈥�
A speaker who identified herself as an emergency room nurse, said the panelist were downplaying the problem of drug use in the homeless community.
鈥淗ave you ever worked in emerg with someone who has used and has gotten something bad and seen their violence?鈥� she asked. 鈥淏ecause what they signed two weeks ago makes no difference at that time, and the violence is severe. And not to have security in that home I think would put every single person in that home at risk if you鈥檙e allowing drugs in.鈥�
Many others were more upset about the notification for the meeting, with several people stating they did not receive a notice in their mail about the public consultations, or received notice late, after the sessions already began.
One man,who did not provide his name, stated that the 鈥渞oom was empty鈥� because no one knew about the meeting.
A representative of BC Housing said that notices were mailed out through Canada Post, and that any mailbox with a red dot (indicating no flyers are wanted) would not have received one.
READ MORE:
But there were many others in attendance who said they support the project.
A lady who identified herself only as Kathy broke down into tears while sharing her personal struggle with homelessness and addiction over the last 12 years.
Kathy said she has lived in the Township of 91原创 for 35 years, and owned a house for 15 of those years. She said the way people were speaking about the homeless made her feel like 鈥渁 piece of crap on the side of the road.鈥�
鈥淲e鈥檙e not all bad people, and if you come and have one-on-one talks with us 鈥� I鈥檒l even buy the coffee. I鈥檒l sit and talk to you, I can address your questions. Please, just have a look at the face of what homeless is now,鈥� she said.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 want to leave 91原创, because I love 91原创. 91原创鈥檚 my home, it鈥檚 my community. Why should I go to Hope, Kelowna, or anywhere else, just so you don鈥檛 have to go? Why should I be made to feel that I鈥檓 not welcome in the community? I would never hurt you.鈥�
John Kreidel said he was also once homeless, and credited Black Dog Farms Society for getting him off the streets and providing him housing. He said 鈥渋t doesn鈥檛 make sense鈥� to him people would not be in favour of supportive housing.
Another speaker, who did not give his name, said he has two brothers-in-law who are schizophrenic and ended up on the streets. One received support and is now living the 鈥渂est life he can,鈥� while the other has no access to housing services and continues to struggle.
鈥淭hese kinds of places where you can have a managed environment where all the assessments can happen for mental illness, for addiction, trauma 鈥� these things work. I鈥檝e seen it in my own experience,鈥� he said. 鈥淎nd the more we can set up these kinds of environments for the people that are needy that cannot help themselves 鈥� they need help. We have to have the compassion to help these people or they will die.鈥�
It is now up to the Township of 91原创 to decide if the supportive housing project will proceed. BC Housing submitted a rezoning application, and through that process, residents will get one last chance to share their comments during the Township鈥檚 public hearing. The date for that has not been determined.
miranda@langleytimes.com
Like us on and follow us on
