By Natasha Bulowski, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Canadian environmental groups have levelled another greenwashing complaint 鈥� this time at the largest certification scheme for sustainable forestry in North America.
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) certifies 115 million hectares of forest within Canada鈥檚 borders for companies.
In a filed to Competition Bureau Canada, environmental groups allege the SFI鈥檚 claims of sustainability are 鈥渇alse and misleading鈥� because it has 鈥渘o rules requiring that logging meet prescribed sustainability criteria nor any on-the-ground assessment to confirm sustainability.鈥�
鈥淭he misrepresentations made by the SFI have contributed and continue to contribute to unsustainable logging globally and in Canada on an immense scale,鈥� according to the complaint filed Dec. 1 by Ecojustice.
The environmental law charity filed the complaint on behalf of eight environmental organizations including Greenpeace Canada, Wildlands League, David Suzuki Foundation and Ecology Action Centre. The bureau has yet to decide whether to open an inquiry.
鈥淲e welcome any scrutiny into our program and are positioned well to address any issues,鈥� SFI鈥檚 senior vice-president of customer affairs, Jason Metnick, said in an email to Canada鈥檚 National Observer.
鈥淎t the heart of this inquiry is whether SFI鈥檚 standards require outcomes-based impact to make sustainability statements. The answer is absolutely yes,鈥� Metnick鈥檚 statement reads.
The complaint says otherwise. When people go to a hardware store and see wood products like lumber with the SFI鈥檚 leaf-like certification symbol, it implies the wood was logged in a sustainable manner that conserves the ecological balance of a forest by trying not to deplete it, said Devon Page, executive director of Ecojustice. However, logging companies are not tested to ensure the outcome of their operations is sustainable in order to get that symbol 鈥� SFI certifies a process, not the actual outcome, he said.
In response, Metnick pointed to SFI鈥檚 , which are conducted by .
SFI certification is a 鈥渕anagement systems-based standard,鈥� meaning companies must follow their processes to some extent to be certified, according to the complaint. To ensure sustainable forestry is the outcome of those processes, you need a 鈥減erformance-based standard,鈥� which requires companies to achieve results in order to get the sustainable forestry stamp of approval, it reads.
Some forests also simply aren鈥檛 renewable, said Page, pointing to 300-year-old forests whose ecosystems allow for species at risk to survive 鈥� like the marbled murrelet, a small north Pacific seabird that nests in the tops of old-growth trees. Canada鈥檚 quickly declining forests are largely logged to burn for fuel or to create short-lived paper products and are now adding more planet-warming carbon dioxide to the atmosphere than they remove, according to analysis by Canada鈥檚 National Observer columnist Barry Saxifrage.
B.C. Premier David Eby recently warned 鈥渟hort-term thinking鈥� on land management has 鈥渆xhausted鈥� forests. There is an 鈥渋nescapable recognition 鈥� that change is needed to ensure our forest industry is sustainable,鈥� Eby wrote in the mandate letter for new Forests Minister Bruce Ralston.
The BC NDP is lagging on commitments it made to address logging of the province鈥檚 old-growth forests more than two years ago, environmental groups say.
鈥淲hen you log the trees, you lose the species, you lose the ecosystem, it鈥檚 lost,鈥� said Page. 鈥淲hat we鈥檙e watching is a lack of sustainable logging generally and massive over-logging in Canada, while concurrently, industry is championing this logo that said it was sustainable.鈥�
Earlier this month, a leaked letter from Canada鈥檚 ambassador to the European Union, Ailish Campbell, revealed Canada鈥檚 attempts to water down proposed EU forestry trade regulations that would eliminate unsustainably sourced wood products from the market, The Guardian reported.
Page expects the Competition Bureau to decide in the next couple months whether it will open an inquiry into Ecojustice鈥檚 complaint. The bureau recently opened inquiries into the Canadian Gas Association and RBC for greenwashing allegations. In January, the bureau ordered Keurig Canada to pay $3 million for misleading consumers about the recyclability of its single-use coffee pods. As part of the settlement, Keurig Canada also had to change its recyclable claims and the packaging of its K-Cup pods.
鈥� With files from The Canadian Press
Like us on and follow us on .
