91原创

Skip to content

Questions about facilities report

Concerns are raised about assumptions made by planning firm in looking at 91原创 School District facilities.

Editor: I would like to comment on the My concern is with planner Hugh Skinner and his company GMHA, whom the school district hired to create this plan.

When I and other community members (with trustees and senior management) attended one of the facilities meetings in April, Skinner stated that Fort 91原创 Elementary saw an increase in its enrolment due to the closure of County Line. I stated that (being on the school鈥檚 SPC at the time) that Fort 91原创 did not see any increase in its enrolment due to the closure, and that the increase had come from the development of Bedford Landing. Skinner then asked 鈥淲hat is Bedford Landing?鈥

He assured me it would be corrected in the final plan. My concern is how much the planner knows about the community of 91原创, or does he only know about the one area of 91原创 that is seeing the most growth. The plan is not inclusive, it is exclusive.

Jacqueline Cook,

91原创



About the Author: Black Press Media Staff

Read more



(or

91原创

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }